Thursday Morning Pairs Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Scores after 25 boards Average: 25.0 Section A Pair Pct Score Sectn Rank MPs A B 1 52.60 26.30 A Teresa Duewer - Pang-Pen Sheng 2 42.50 21.25 A Chuck Wong - William Hodges 3 58.50 29.25 A 2 0.42(A) Marvin Griebrok - Ed Jimison 4 61.46 30.73 A 1 0.60(A) Carl Highley - Alice Herceg 5 40.22 20.11 B June Cost - Pat O'Brien 6 44.50 22.25 B William Beeson - Charles Roberts Thursday Morning Pairs, Thursday Morn, February 19, 2009 RESULTS OF BOARD 1 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 460 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 1-Duewer-Sheng 450 0.50 1.50 2-Wong-Hodges vs 4-Highley-Herceg 450 0.50 1.50 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 5-Cost-O'Brien ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 2 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 130 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 1-Duewer-Sheng 100 1.00 1.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 4-Highley-Herceg 300 0.00 2.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 5-Cost-O'Brien ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 3 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 180 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 1-Duewer-Sheng 150 1.00 1.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 4-Highley-Herceg 90 2.00 0.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 5-Cost-O'Brien ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 4 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 200 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 1-Duewer-Sheng 170 2.00 0.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 4-Highley-Herceg 140 1.00 1.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 5-Cost-O'Brien ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 5 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 1.00 1.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 1-Duewer-Sheng 150 0.00 2.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 4-Highley-Herceg 120 2.00 0.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 5-Cost-O'Brien ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 6 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 1.00 1.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 2-Wong-Hodges 140 1.00 1.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 4-Highley-Herceg 140 1.00 1.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 7 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 130 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 2-Wong-Hodges 660 2.00 0.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 4-Highley-Herceg 230 1.00 1.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 8 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 170 1.00 1.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 2-Wong-Hodges 400 2.00 0.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 4-Highley-Herceg 50 0.00 2.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 200 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 2-Wong-Hodges 600 0.00 2.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 4-Highley-Herceg 170 1.00 1.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 10 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 1.00 1.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 2-Wong-Hodges 100 1.00 1.00 3-Griebrok-Jimison vs 4-Highley-Herceg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 11 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 450 1.50 0.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 450 1.50 0.50 4-Highley-Herceg vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 300 0.00 2.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 2-Wong-Hodges ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 12 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 130 0.50 1.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 50 2.00 0.00 4-Highley-Herceg vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 130 0.50 1.50 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 2-Wong-Hodges ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 13 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 200 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 500 2.00 0.00 4-Highley-Herceg vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 120 1.00 1.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 2-Wong-Hodges ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 14 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 450 1.00 1.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 110 2.00 0.00 4-Highley-Herceg vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 470 0.00 2.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 2-Wong-Hodges ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 15 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 0.25 1.75 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 140 1.75 0.25 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 2-Wong-Hodges ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 16 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 4-Highley-Herceg 180 2.00 0.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 2-Wong-Hodges 140 1.00 1.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 17 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 150 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 4-Highley-Herceg 50 2.00 0.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 2-Wong-Hodges 50 1.00 1.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 18 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 200 0.50 1.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 4-Highley-Herceg 200 0.50 1.50 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 2-Wong-Hodges 600 2.00 0.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 19 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 0.50 1.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 4-Highley-Herceg 200 2.00 0.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 2-Wong-Hodges 100 0.50 1.50 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 20 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 0.00 2.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 4-Highley-Herceg 140 2.00 0.00 5-Cost-O'Brien vs 2-Wong-Hodges PASS 1.00 1.00 1-Duewer-Sheng vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 21 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 650 1.50 0.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 100 0.00 2.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 650 1.50 0.50 4-Highley-Herceg vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 22 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 100 1.00 1.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 50 0.00 2.00 4-Highley-Herceg vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 23 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 200 0.00 2.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 100 1.00 1.00 4-Highley-Herceg vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 24 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 510 0.50 1.50 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 1010 2.00 0.00 2-Wong-Hodges vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 510 0.50 1.50 4-Highley-Herceg vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 25 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 2.00 0.00 6-Beeson-Roberts vs 5-Cost-O'Brien 100 0.50 1.50 2-Wong-Hodges vs 3-Griebrok-Jimison 100 0.50 1.50 4-Highley-Herceg vs 1-Duewer-Sheng ----------------------------------------------------------------------Summary for Pair A 1 Teresa Duewer - Pang-Pen Sheng Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum A Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE E-W 6 -460 0 14 E NONE N-S 2 -470 0 2 E N-S E-W 6 -130 0 15 S N-S N-S 2 140 1.75 3 S E-W E-W 6 180 2 16 W E-W N-S 3 140 1 4 W BOTH E-W 6 200 2 17 N NONE N-S 3 -50 1 5 N N-S E-W 6 140 1 18 E N-S N-S 3 600 2 6 E E-W E-W 5 140 1 19 S E-W N-S 3 100 0.5 7 S BOTH E-W 5 -230 1 20 W BOTH N-S 3 PASS 1 8 W NONE E-W 5 50 2 21 N N-S E-W 4 -650 0.5 9 N E-W E-W 5 170 1 22 E E-W E-W 4 50 2 11 S NONE N-S 2 300 0 23 S BOTH E-W 4 100 1 12 W N-S N-S 2 -130 0.5 24 W NONE E-W 4 -510 1.5 13 N BOTH N-S 2 120 1 25 N E-W E-W 4 100 1.5 TOTAL: 25.25 SESSION SCORE: 26.30 PERCENT: 52.60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 2 Chuck Wong - William Hodges Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum A Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE N-S 4 450 0.5 14 E NONE E-W 1 470 2 2 E N-S N-S 4 -100 1 15 S N-S E-W 1 -140 0.25 3 S E-W N-S 4 -150 1 16 W E-W E-W 5 -180 0 4 W BOTH N-S 4 170 2 17 N NONE E-W 5 -50 0 5 N N-S N-S 4 -150 0 18 E N-S E-W 5 200 1.5 6 E E-W E-W 6 140 1 19 S E-W E-W 5 -200 0 7 S BOTH E-W 6 -130 2 20 W BOTH E-W 5 -140 0 8 W NONE E-W 6 -170 1 21 N N-S N-S 3 -100 0 9 N E-W E-W 6 -200 0 22 E E-W N-S 3 100 1 10 E BOTH E-W 6 100 1 23 S BOTH N-S 3 -200 0 11 S NONE E-W 1 -300 2 24 W NONE N-S 3 1010 2 12 W N-S E-W 1 130 1.5 25 N E-W N-S 3 -100 0.5 13 N BOTH E-W 1 -120 1 TOTAL: 21.25 SESSION SCORE: 21.25 PERCENT: 42.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 3 Marvin Griebrok - Ed Jimison Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum A Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE N-S 5 450 0.5 14 E NONE E-W 6 450 1 2 E N-S N-S 5 -300 0 15 S N-S E-W 6 100 1.75 3 S E-W N-S 5 -90 2 16 W E-W E-W 1 -140 1 4 W BOTH N-S 5 140 1 17 N NONE E-W 1 50 1 5 N N-S N-S 5 -120 2 18 E N-S E-W 1 -600 0 6 E E-W N-S 4 -140 1 19 S E-W E-W 1 -100 1.5 7 S BOTH N-S 4 660 2 20 W BOTH E-W 1 PASS 1 8 W NONE N-S 4 400 2 21 N N-S E-W 2 100 2 9 N E-W N-S 4 -600 0 22 E E-W E-W 2 -100 1 10 E BOTH N-S 4 -100 1 23 S BOTH E-W 2 200 2 11 S NONE E-W 6 -450 0.5 24 W NONE E-W 2 -1010 0 12 W N-S E-W 6 130 1.5 25 N E-W E-W 2 100 1.5 13 N BOTH E-W 6 200 2 TOTAL: 29.25 SESSION SCORE: 29.25 PERCENT: 58.50 Session rank: 2(A) MASTER POINTS: 0.42 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 4 Carl Highley - Alice Herceg Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum A Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE E-W 2 -450 1.5 13 N BOTH N-S 5 500 2 2 E N-S E-W 2 100 1 14 E NONE N-S 5 -110 2 3 S E-W E-W 2 150 1 16 W E-W E-W 6 -110 2 4 W BOTH E-W 2 -170 0 17 N NONE E-W 6 150 2 5 N N-S E-W 2 150 2 18 E N-S E-W 6 200 1.5 6 E E-W E-W 3 140 1 19 S E-W E-W 6 -100 1.5 7 S BOTH E-W 3 -660 0 20 W BOTH E-W 6 110 2 8 W NONE E-W 3 -400 0 21 N N-S N-S 1 650 1.5 9 N E-W E-W 3 600 2 22 E E-W N-S 1 -50 0 10 E BOTH E-W 3 100 1 23 S BOTH N-S 1 -100 1 11 S NONE N-S 5 450 1.5 24 W NONE N-S 1 510 0.5 12 W N-S N-S 5 50 2 25 N E-W N-S 1 -100 0.5 TOTAL: 29.50 SESSION SCORE: 30.73 PERCENT: 61.46 Session rank: 1(A) MASTER POINTS: 0.60 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 5 June Cost - Pat O'Brien Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum B Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE E-W 3 -450 1.5 14 E NONE E-W 4 110 0 2 E N-S E-W 3 300 2 16 W E-W N-S 2 180 2 3 S E-W E-W 3 90 0 17 N NONE N-S 2 50 2 4 W BOTH E-W 3 -140 1 18 E N-S N-S 2 -200 0.5 5 N N-S E-W 3 120 0 19 S E-W N-S 2 200 2 6 E E-W N-S 1 -140 1 20 W BOTH N-S 2 140 2 7 S BOTH N-S 1 230 1 21 N N-S E-W 6 -650 0.5 8 W NONE N-S 1 -50 0 22 E E-W E-W 6 -110 0 9 N E-W N-S 1 -170 1 23 S BOTH E-W 6 -140 0 11 S NONE E-W 4 -450 0.5 24 W NONE E-W 6 -510 1.5 12 W N-S E-W 4 -50 0 25 N E-W E-W 6 -420 0 13 N BOTH E-W 4 -500 0 TOTAL: 18.50 SESSION SCORE: 20.11 PERCENT: 40.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 6 William Beeson - Charles Roberts Thursday Morning Pairs Stratum B Thursday Morn Session February 19, 2009 Ashland Bridge Club 221119 Average: 25.0 Top on a Board: 2 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE N-S 1 460 2 14 E NONE N-S 3 -450 1 2 E N-S N-S 1 130 2 15 S N-S N-S 3 -100 0.25 3 S E-W N-S 1 -180 0 16 W E-W N-S 4 110 0 4 W BOTH N-S 1 -200 0 17 N NONE N-S 4 -150 0 5 N N-S N-S 1 -140 1 18 E N-S N-S 4 -200 0.5 6 E E-W N-S 2 -140 1 19 S E-W N-S 4 100 0.5 7 S BOTH N-S 2 130 0 20 W BOTH N-S 4 -110 0 8 W NONE N-S 2 170 1 21 N N-S N-S 5 650 1.5 9 N E-W N-S 2 200 2 22 E E-W N-S 5 110 2 10 E BOTH N-S 2 -100 1 23 S BOTH N-S 5 140 2 11 S NONE N-S 3 450 1.5 24 W NONE N-S 5 510 0.5 12 W N-S N-S 3 -130 0.5 25 N E-W N-S 5 420 2 13 N BOTH N-S 3 -200 0 TOTAL: 22.25 SESSION SCORE: 22.25 PERCENT: 44.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------